1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
---
title: The Stasi and the implications of surveillance
author: Mohit Agarwal
date: July 2021
bibliography: ["reference.bib"]
link-citations: true
nocite: '@*'
---
<!-- *y -->
# Surveillance in powerful systems
A government may get involved in the regular surveillance of its
citizens for many reasons. The interception of communications are
readily visible (inelegant) including the interception of mail in the
American colonies by the British in the years before the American
Revolution. This also included the change and destruction of
information, yet the purpose remains the same as modern surveillance:
to watch over citizens that the ruling authority does not trust or
claims cannot be trusted. Those who wish to monitor modern electronic
communications may suggest that such an operation exists in the
interest of the safety of the public, by stopping crime and terrorism.
# The prevalence of the Stasi
Much of the Stasi's strength came from its numbers. The Stasi was able
to infiltrate every facet of the East German society to an astounding
extent. The reputation of the Stasi is well deserved from the power to
plant the seeds of doubt within the population.
The methods of the Stasi are often described as inducing fear in
citizens.
# The end of the Stasi
Perhaps the most interesting
# Surveillance and control
The tools of surveillance served the state, and in return the state
served the Stasi. Just as to us, surveillance agencies and government
may appear separate, in East Germany they were demonstrably not. There
is arguably a great deal more power and flexibility was afforded to
the rulers of the state by the actions of the Stasi. The authoritarian
stance of the ruling party existed not only in high level politics,
but in the daily lives of the individual. In this way, survaillance is
much like propaganda. Surveillance, often in a way that people may not
at first initially recognise, is able to have a widespread impact on
individuals according to the wishes of those in power.
In the GDR, those in power wanted to actively control the lives of
their citizens, and ensure behaviour according to the rules of the
state. Surveillance might serve those who want control particularly
effectively. The Stasi was able to influence people through their
surveillance and their spread to all assets of society. The Stasi was
able to make its way into the groups it considered 'enemies', such as
the Church. Many members of the church were Stasi members or
informants, and by this method of infiltration, surveillance can
empower those who wish to control their populations to find and
silence dissenters. This has the ability to create an atmosphere of
fear, where one is unaware of who may be an informant and is aware of
what not to say to others. A consideration of who 'worked for' the
Stasi is important. The number of Stasi informants were much larger
than full-time Stasi officers [@popular-involvement]. This is the tool
of controlling surveillance: seeping into the small parts of our
societies; in schools, factories, churches, and families the Stasi had
far greater power and knowledge than it would on a higher level.
This consideration has major implications with the development of
technology following the end of the Stasi's operations, given the
prevalence of sophisticated devices with microphones and cameras,
which the Stasi went to great lengths to plant in private places, but
that we carry around with us as granted.
# Conclusions
In a sense the reality of the Stasi and the ways in which it impacted
the lives of people in East Germany present us with an opportiunity to
look carefully at a surveillance state that so recently fell apart.
There are many people alive today who have lived under the influence
of the Stasi and are yet to share their stories. It is by
understanding the Stasi that we can understand the increasingly
visible surveillance in our current societies, and avoid reliving the
experiences of others that we don't expect to through naivety and
don't wish to once we are shown them.
The nature of surveillance and the way in which technology enables it,
just as the Stasi were able to make use of telephone calls to spy on
citizens, is something that we cannot ignore, given our knowledge of
the past. Mass surveillance and the impacts it has are naturally not
limited to the Stasi, yet the seeming otherworldliness of events in
East Germany feel like looking clearly through a lens, particularly in
comparison to trying to make sense of the societies we live in. Thus
the opportunity information about the Stasi provides is a very
valuable one, given the clear view and judgement we are able to have
on it and thus our potential to learn more from it than other examples
of survaillance.
<-- horrible ending
# References and bibliography
|
