aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/papers/3.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'papers/3.tex')
-rw-r--r--papers/3.tex2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/papers/3.tex b/papers/3.tex
index efbc913..a4ba95e 100644
--- a/papers/3.tex
+++ b/papers/3.tex
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Thus, overall, while AH response is a good substantive explanation answering the
In this paper, I have examined three responses to Williamson's Explanation Challenge and argued that each response faces their own problems. While I argue for the stronger conclusion that the first two challenges fail, I argue for the weaker conclusion that the last response succeeds but only with additional dialectical cost to contingentism. I hope this paper has helped to clarify the stake of Williamson's ``first horn" to contingentism in Chapter 6 and strengthen his argument against contingentism.
\section{Appendix}
-
+\setlength{\tabcolsep}{0pt}
\subsection{The proof for (Tracking)}
First, we can observe the following proof: \\
\begin{quote}