From eb0ac1c3704d7c4a5751a89ebc27387975abd269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Walchuk <jpw24@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 13:27:49 +0100
Subject: +1 graphic

---
 papers/2.tex | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

(limited to 'papers/2.tex')

diff --git a/papers/2.tex b/papers/2.tex
index 82a2c67..79915af 100644
--- a/papers/2.tex
+++ b/papers/2.tex
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 \chapter{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness}
 \chaptermark{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness}
-
+\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przybrorwski, \textit{
+University of St Andrews
+}}
 \renewcommand*{\thesection}{\arabic{section}.}
 \renewcommand*{\thesubsection}{\arabic{section}.\arabic{subsection}.}
 
@@ -255,13 +257,9 @@ true at all precisifications - and by the same reasoning, so is
 ${D^{*}D}^{*}F$. Therefore, the S4 principle effectively applies to
 $D^{*}$ (see diagram below).
 
-%\includegraphics[width=3.97674in,height=4.66543in]{media/image1.png}
 \begin{center}
-  \begin{tikzpicture}
-    \node at (0, 0) {\texttt{[GRAPHICS FORTHCOMING]}};
-    \end{tikzpicture}
-  \end{center}
-  
+\includegraphics[width=3.97674in,height=4.66543in]{papers/figures/2-1.pdf}
+\end{center}
 Consequently, Williamson concludes that higher-order vagueness
 disappears.\footnote{Williamson, \emph{Vagueness}, 160.} This is
 because, for supervaluationism to succeed, each metalanguage must be
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

