diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | papers/2.tex | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | papers/3.tex | 2 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/papers/2.tex b/papers/2.tex index 0ec12ed..042f9b5 100644 --- a/papers/2.tex +++ b/papers/2.tex @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ \chapter{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness} \chaptermark{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness} -\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przybrorwski, \textit{ +\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przyborowski, \textit{ University of St Andrews }} \renewcommand*{\thesection}{\arabic{section}.} @@ -424,9 +424,10 @@ fundamentally in conflict with the finite Sorites. There seems to be no way to accommodate the problem without making strong alterations to the model. + \section{5. Positive proposal --- dynamizing supervaluationism} -\subsection{5.1. Introducing dynamic supervaluationism} +\subsection{Introducing dynamic supervaluationism} I believe that Keefe's problems can be addressed by making the structure's categories dynamic. My proposal is loosely based on diff --git a/papers/3.tex b/papers/3.tex index 072a5d5..a366c73 100644 --- a/papers/3.tex +++ b/papers/3.tex @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\chapter{Defending Williamson's Explanatory Challenge to Contingentism} +\chapter{Defending Williamson's Explanatory Challenge to Contingentism\footnote{I am grateful to Prof. Eric Guindon, Shichen Wang, Caleb Camrud, and Claire Robertson for very helpful discussion on issues in the paper. I thank anonymous reviewers at Aporia for their feedback on the paper. Finally, I am grateful to my very good friends for their constant support.}} \chaptermark{Defending Williamson's Explanatory Challenge to Contingentism} \chapterauthor{Koda Li, \textit{Brown University}} |