diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | papers/2.tex | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/papers/2.tex b/papers/2.tex index 0ec12ed..938d0bd 100644 --- a/papers/2.tex +++ b/papers/2.tex @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ \chapter{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness} \chaptermark{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness} -\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przybrorwski, \textit{ +\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przybrorowski, \textit{ University of St Andrews }} \renewcommand*{\thesection}{\arabic{section}.} @@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ fundamentally in conflict with the finite Sorites. There seems to be no way to accommodate the problem without making strong alterations to the model. -\section{5. Positive proposal --- dynamizing supervaluationism} +\section{Positive proposal --- dynamizing supervaluationism} -\subsection{5.1. Introducing dynamic supervaluationism} +\subsection{Introducing dynamic supervaluationism} I believe that Keefe's problems can be addressed by making the structure's categories dynamic. My proposal is loosely based on |