aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJacob Walchuk <jpw24@st-andrews.ac.uk>2025-07-25 10:05:02 -0700
committerJacob Walchuk <jpw24@st-andrews.ac.uk>2025-07-25 10:05:02 -0700
commitb11f650d7258852aa44cf41a771227295c591557 (patch)
treefe5029d9a9912cff89b483fa81b0e3b8bcfbd301
parent4a45aefb431365da5e6e93ceec8e7931630682f7 (diff)
fix
-rw-r--r--papers/2.tex6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/papers/2.tex b/papers/2.tex
index a55ee73..daf312e 100644
--- a/papers/2.tex
+++ b/papers/2.tex
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
\chapter{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness}
\chaptermark{Supervaluationism, Dynamic Supervaluationism, and Higher-Order Vagueness}
-\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przybrorwski, \textit{
+\chapterauthor{Wiktor Przybrorowski, \textit{
University of St Andrews
}}
\renewcommand*{\thesection}{\arabic{section}.}
@@ -426,9 +426,9 @@ fundamentally in conflict with the finite Sorites. There seems to be no
way to accommodate the problem without making strong alterations to the
model.
-\section{5. Positive proposal -- dynamizing supervaluationism}
+\section{Positive proposal -- dynamizing supervaluationism}
-\subsection{5.1. Introducing dynamic supervaluationism}
+\subsection{Introducing dynamic supervaluationism}
I believe that Keefe's problems can be addressed by making the
structure's categories dynamic. My proposal is loosely based on